Self-Feedback to feedforward using the simple function "duplicate" in sketchbook
Alright, today we will share about how to use Samsung tablets for seamless designing, and one of the suggestions is to use Duplicate. With Duplicate, students can think about how their previous drawings can be improved. The question posed is: why is there a need to duplicate, and what happens if the drawing is poor at the start? I mentioned that this is not about drawing, but rather about how students can think critically about improving their previous drawings. Typically, drawings are seen as an expression of ideas, but often, they remain as just an ongoing expression without improvement and evaluation. So, the purpose of Duplicate is to help students refine their designs. That is the first part of the learning process.
The other part is about seamlessness. Students can create drawings and documents simultaneously because Samsung tablets allow saving directly to Google Drive, where files are securely stored. Students can save all their images into a folder and then upload them to Google Slide, which can be shared digitally. Actually, I was thinking—since students have all these images, can they convert them into a PDF file by selecting all the images before publishing? Eventually, the final output will be in PDF format for SEAB submission, why do we need to create a slide? We can discuss this part further later.
Is there an easier way so that documentation is not required? Essentially, students should just be able to create their designs without taking extra steps for documentation.
I will also share about a concept. This concept involves drawing one image on a single screen, then using the Move button to resize and place it to one side, adjusting different sizes as needed. The tablet also has shortcut keys, where students can use three-finger touch gestures to quickly send files, and several commonly used actions can be performed more efficiently.
In this context, efficiency depends on how easily students can manipulate image blocks, making digital work far more effective compared to using paper. Just a short 1 hour try-out in PLT, we discovered and shared quite a few ideas.
With the help of ChatGPT,
To reflect more critically on this experience, you could start by considering a few key questions:
Effectiveness: How effectively did the use of Samsung tablets facilitate the 'Feed Forward' concept? What were the tangible improvements observed in students' work with duplicate as a "trigger" for students to think about their sketches.
Challenges: What challenges did you or the students face in implementing this method? Were there any unexpected obstacles?
Student Engagement: How engaged were the students with this approach? Did it encourage them to think more critically and creatively about their designs? Will the seamless process help students to better innovate?
Improvements: What improvements could be made to this process? How can the integration of technology be refined to better support students' learning?
Documentation: How can you streamline the documentation process further, ensuring it remains seamless and efficient while maintaining high quality?
Comments
Post a Comment