NJY Thrive Reflection

  Check-in routine Check-in by keying in "I am ready at... and will be..." Looking at the feedback given by Mr Ng and improve. Looking for one student's work and help him/her improve Improving my work by looking for * who have shown a good example Check-out routine Recall today's learning objective Self-test to check understanding Suggest how to improve my learning (e.g. ask questions when in doubt, have a notebook to take notes, listen and analyse what my teacher/friend said)  What is the theoretical underpinning? The check-in routine to leverage the use of setting up time to get students ready. The are improving and helping other to improve. -> Improvable ideas and democratising knowledge. Started to align leadership role based on their strength to inculate collective responsibility X is Padlet's attendance I want to know if the objective is not explicitly given up front, can student articulate objective at the end

Classroom time is precious, and I want to give more voice to my students; it can be challenging to talk and respond to what works for them in terms of planning for an activity. When I see that the group is not collaborating well, I think on my feet and suggest three ways to collaborate.  Can homework be co-planning with teachers?

Joon Yong Reflection  Using PAIR framework Students can ask questions without detecting when ChatGPT suggests an answer. In D&T, it is important for students to probe Chat GPT using potential solutions. In this critical act, I can imagine what GPT describes as going closer to the answer, but the students cannot do so. When GPT describe the solution in detail, it is the best opportunity to test students sketching from imagination. I clarify what it means to be a problem by using 5 why.

 The framework for reflection as assessment does not work when not scaffolded!  Students faced difficulty comparing against criteria, comparing peers' work and providing feedback for improvement I need to simplify the reflection process. I think need to think through the reflection question very carefully Today, when I asked the solution to compare the three models, it seemed that there were differences till I suggested the following strategies Grp 1. Each, give one word that you think is relevant to the stage of the design process and how you can bring these words together to describe the process. This group seemed to be lost in terms of how to contribute but with the instruction, managed to come out with the process of one group.  Grp 2. The process is out by one who takes the lead to use ICT to come out with the design process, and the members explain how they contributed (I wonder how sketching and contribution work) Grp 3. The third group sketched one model and built...