Principled vs procedural approach in design journalling

In a knowledge-building environment, students should have the epistemic agency to write their own stories about their design journey. 

How can we build up students competency using knowledge building principles by integrating assessment into their learning

How can we start them off with strategies like random lines? 

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Thrive 55 - Clarifying the level of purpose in dialogic feedback - Ecological perspective

Based on Ajjwai's ecological framework, the purpose of dialogic feedback could be articulated at different levels. Level 1 (Microsystem) - To clarify students understand our feedback (information) Level 2 (Chronosystem) - To develop the feedback literacy as framed by Carless and Boud (2018). To develop as a person to respectfully challenge authoritative knowledge through (inner) dialogue with material (Nicol, 2010) Level 3 (Mesosystem) - To experience peer/teacher/parent dialogic feedback beyond subject discipline and learn how to navigate the different modes of dialogue. Level 4 (Exosystem) - To structure the school/depart curriculum that promotes active participation in the assessment process. To promote the ethic of care in feedback dialogue (Bozalek et al., 2016) with students, parents, and internal and external stakeholders. Level 5 (Macrosystem) - To appreciate the ideal of democracy in Singapore
Read more

Thrive 66 - Drawing from imagination

Image
 Improvement to Coin-box project to provide opportunities for students to sketch from imagination. Training the sense of proportion. By setting constraints that a square acrylic cannot be cut, the hole size is fixed, and zero-waste design (all cut-out material has to be reused). Can students imagine the possibility?  A paper mock-up may be used as a scaffold in this case if the students cannot visualise.
Read more