Thrive 29 - Group formation for peer feedback

Trios is reported to be the best based on my review of literature on peer assessment in the secondary school context (see Ng, 2022). This is affirmed by Min research work. However, Prof Min used a random assignment approach where I propose a systematic assignment of high, middle and low ability to form a group. It is unclear if such an arrangement could be an optimal formation if each of them is trained with feedback-seeking strategies. For example, having lower-achieving students trained to ask higher-order questions while higher-achieving students teach while gaining metacognitive insights from thinking about the questions and explaining to the lower-achieving students.

What could be the roles of students in a heterogeneous group?

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

2024 Thrive 3 - Self-evaluation of sketching using pen

My reflection with AI about the STEM project